The REAL Band of Brothers
I like the HBO series "Band of Brothers", no doubt about it. I remembered when I watched the series how impressed I was with how the men of 101st Airborne Division held out against the continuous artillery bombardment and encirclement by the Germans in the Battle of the Bulge.
However, it was only recently when I finished a book on the Second World War told from the perspective of the Wehrmacht (the German Army) that I realised that compared to what the German soldiers went through in the war, the Battle of the Bulge was really no big deal. To put things into its proper perspective, we must note the following points; that the Americans were encircled for only about a week, they had abundant food and warm clothing for the winter while they hid in their trenches, they were aware that reinforcements could come anytime (though out of pride, the Americans were later said to remark that they never did ask for reinforcements) and finally, they knew they were on the winning side of the war. Compare this to the battle front in the USSR, where some German units were encircled by the Soviets for months, held out against thousands of assaults and without sufficient warm clothing and other basic equipment. What the 101st Airborne Division endured was hardly superhuman. Most of the contemporary renditions of the Second World War had the Western front as its setting but the most brutal battles and highest casualties were suffered in the east, in the Titanic struggle between the Soviet Union and Germany.
I once read a comment on the web that if one only saw "Band of Brothers" and "Saving Private Ryan", one would probably come away with the impression that the United States single-handedly deliver the world from Facism and that the Americans were the best and bravest soldiers. I suppose most people with more than a rudimentary knowledge of the Second World War would cite the landing at Normandy on 6 June 1944 as the most important battle that decisively turned the tide against the Third Reich. Nothing could be further from the truth. The D-Day landing, the largest sea and airborne invasion in human history was in fact an act of desperation. The Americans and British were desperate because already in the East, after untold losses, the Red Army was driving the Wehrmacht all the way back to Germany and they were afraid that if they did not push in soon, the whole of Europe would fall under the Red Flag. Comparatively, the Americans and British had a much easier time fighting the Germans because the Soviets had done all the dirty work for them in weakening the Germans with even higher losses on themselves.
A close examination of the war should also reveal that the Americans were not exceptional soldiers. The war was won not so much because the Americans had better commanders and more well trained soldiers. In fact, man to man and commander to commander, the Germans were much better. The war was won because the Allies basically out produced the Germans in everything, from human bodies in the number of soldiers, to rifles, aircraft, tanks and other commodities necessary for the conduct of modern warfare. The war was simply won on brute economic strength. Picture Uncle Sam as a heavy weight boxer and Germany as a middle weight boxer and during the match, the heavy weight boxer could at any time climb off the ring to rest, drink energy booster and receive medical aid. The middle weight boxer had however continuously fought two matches and had none of the luxuries of the heavy weight. Even an idiot could guess the outcome of the match before it started.
In fact the amazing thing here was how the Germans could held out so long. For most of the war, the Germans found themselves undersupplied, given insane orders by Hitler (the most common of which was to hold ground and die) and fighting on more than one front. Yet they were able to achieve their objectives through the brilliance of many of their commanders and the superior quality of their solders. However, you would never get a German version of the "Band of Brothers". There would probably not be a Russian version of the "Band of Brothers" though they went through real hell compared to the Americans. Instead, you would only get the American version for 2 reasons. First, they won the war and second Hollywood belongs to America. The real band of brothers would thus remained forgotten, their bodies strewn in unmarked graves across the vast plains of Russia.


4 Comments:
Aiyah, you win the war, you get to do the movies, TV and book deals. A situation as old as time. Not seen any movies about the heroism of the WW2 Japanese Imperial Army either, have you? No "Saving Private Sato" or "Band of Samurai" for worldwide distribution. In fact the last big Hollywood film to portray any kind of Japanese military, "The Last Samurai", had Tom Cruise as an american captain in the lead.
About the only recent film that explored the situation of the Red Army in WW2 is "Enemy at the Gates". Jude Law (A Brit actor) defending the russian city of Stalingrad from Ed Harris (An American actor). Nowhere a Russian actor, not even Boris Yeltsin. Love interest was Rachel Weisz, another brit actor!
By all accounts the Wermacht was well trained and disciplined, well-equipped (before Hitler broke the pact with Stalin and invaded the USSR)and also much more experienced by the time the US troops. If Hitler did not open the Eastern Front, Germany would likely have been able to repel the Brits and the Americans in Normandy. Shows you what having a bad leader can do to even the best army in the world.
Aiyah, you win the war, you get to do the movies, TV and book deals. A situation as old as time. Not seen any movies about the heroism of the WW2 Japanese Imperial Army either, have you? No "Saving Private Sato" or "Band of Samurai" for worldwide distribution. In fact the last big Hollywood film to portray any kind of Japanese military, "The Last Samurai", had Tom Cruise as an american captain in the lead.
About the only recent film that explored the situation of the Red Army in WW2 is "Enemy at the Gates". Jude Law (A Brit actor) defending the russian city of Stalingrad from Ed Harris (An American actor). Nowhere a Russian actor, not even Boris Yeltsin. Love interest was Rachel Weisz, another brit actor!
By all accounts the Wermacht was well trained and disciplined, well-equipped (before Hitler broke the pact with Stalin and invaded the USSR)and also much more experienced by the time the US troops. If Hitler did not open the Eastern Front, Germany would likely have been able to repel the Brits and the Americans in Normandy. Shows you what having a bad leader can do to even the best army in the world.
Well, fact is even after opening the Eastern Front, there were still chances that Germany could defeat Russia, if only the following did not happen.
1) Hitler did not waste time rescuing Mussolini from some shit he got into in the South and thus delaying the start of the campaign by a few precious weeks
2)Hitler did not meddle with the military orders of his generals in the East
3)Better preparations for the winter
And of course the biggest and most ridiculous blunder was made when for the first time in his life, Hitler tried to be honourable. True to his ally, Japan, when USA declared war on Japan after Pearl Harbour, he declared war on USA. This gave Roosevelt the perfect excuse to enter the war in Europe and thus sealing the fate of the Third Reich
Well if he didn't honour his pact with Imperial Japan, who would send him sushi on naked Geishas for him to eat in the bunker? Hahahahahaha
Post a Comment
<< Home